SF Skyline shown with permission by photographer Lane Hartwell 

How to vote in CA and Bay Area June 3rd, 2008

California votes again. There are plenty of races and ballots that I have little or no opinion on. There are, however, a couple critical items that there is only one way to vote on. For those I offering guidance on how to cast your vote.

CALIFORNIA STATE BALLOT MEASURES
Prop. 98 : NO
By allowing eminent domain you allow for the end of rent control. Rent control is half the reason why San Francisco is San Francisco and Oakland is Oakland. Even landlords want rent control as though they may lose out on some peak revenue during frothy times, it means they are much more likely to not be vacant when things turn bad … and they always do. This is an attempt to modify the California constitution to abolish rent control, not a local initiative. Do not be misled.

Prop. 99 : Yes
99 would mean developers and landlords will no longer be able to use eminent domain to take control of properties and land.

SAN FRANCISCO PROPOSITIONS
Prop. D: Yes
Diversity is important. Require the city to appoint more women, minorities, and people with disabilities to city boards and commissions.

Prop. F: YES
Rebuild Hunters Point the way the community has come together and decided it should be done.

Prop. G: NO
The wording in this prop, also designed to rebuild the Hunter’s Point district sounds idyllic as they come, but it’s all promise without firm commitments based upon the efforts of an out-of-state developer. This is a junk proposition. Do not be fooled.

2 Responses to “How to vote in CA and Bay Area June 3rd, 2008” »»

  1. Comment by ericabiz | 06/03/08 at 10:20 am

    “Rent control is half the reason why San Francisco is San Francisco and Oakland is Oakland.”

    You mean…that SF is full of office buildings and expensive condos and Oakland has an abundance of affordable housing? Then you’re absolutely right. :P

    Rent control doesn’t work, because developers will just build offices or condos that aren’t affected by it, instead of rental units. If you are FOR inexpensive housing in SF, you will want to abolish rent control so developers will actually build rental units. It’s not what your common sense would tell you…but it’s what your economics textbook will tell you.

  2. Comment by Ted R. | 06/03/08 at 11:57 am

    Hi Erica,

    In regards to rent control I think it’s important to look at the long term picture.

    Seriously, how many affordable homes do people actually want to live in in Oakland? Even during the craziest points of the bubble, the small areas near BART stations were the only that saw tennant increases. Oakland’s problem is there is no ‘there’ there. There is no community, no established commitment to the neighborhoods, because it’s a place of transience, simply a way point trying to get to where they’d prefer to be living. (Aside of course from the peidmonts and trestle glens and other affluent ghettos)

    Rent Control makes cities livable. I don’t mean this for the one person’s rent, but in their long-term commitment to a neighborhood. A general feeling of confidence they will be there in 5 years, in 10 in 20 years. A landlord may want more rent $ over the short term, but their investment is entirely reliant on that neighborhood having 20+ years of desirability, such that even in the bad periods people still want to live there. It was the condos and liveworks that’s suffered the worst vacancy rates in SF in 2003, the traditional rental units fared best, because far fewer were deserted by people that could no long afford them.

    Your point about developers not developing rental units is not valid. They’ll never build them as long as their are live-work loft, condos and other means to build property without having to contribute to local schools and neighborhood improvement. I see no new rental buildings in Oakland.

Leave a Reply »»