﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top-Down Government Campaign to Suppress Climate Change Research</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.spideysenses.com/2007/03/28/top-down-government-campaign-to-suppress-climate-change-research/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.spideysenses.com/2007/03/28/top-down-government-campaign-to-suppress-climate-change-research/</link>
	<description>Ted Rheingold's web journal</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 02:50:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.spideysenses.com/2007/03/28/top-down-government-campaign-to-suppress-climate-change-research/comment-page-1/#comment-53021</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 16:26:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spideysenses.com/2007/03/28/top-down-government-campaign-to-suppress-climate-change-research/#comment-53021</guid>
		<description>man, how clear can it be that running government like a corporation (where secrecy &#38; obfuscation are more the norm) is inappropriate, not to mention damaging? i mean, i can only assume that was the idea, given cheney &#38; co.'s background. 

at the very least -- and let's face it, the least is all that's left -- we've got a concrete example that corporate short-term, stockholder-focused thinking is not a viable strategy for managing government. let's just scratch that one off the board, once and for all. 

Plus, if we have time, let's note that carrying yourself like an arrogant prick is not, truth be told, Presidential.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>man, how clear can it be that running government like a corporation (where secrecy &amp; obfuscation are more the norm) is inappropriate, not to mention damaging? i mean, i can only assume that was the idea, given cheney &amp; co.&#8217;s background. </p>
<p>at the very least &#8212; and let&#8217;s face it, the least is all that&#8217;s left &#8212; we&#8217;ve got a concrete example that corporate short-term, stockholder-focused thinking is not a viable strategy for managing government. let&#8217;s just scratch that one off the board, once and for all. </p>
<p>Plus, if we have time, let&#8217;s note that carrying yourself like an arrogant prick is not, truth be told, Presidential.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

